On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 04:34 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 19:07 +0200, Enrico Tröger wrote: > > Sounds quite good so far and wouldn't require much more than a 'svn > > mkdir other' :). > > > > But still the problem what I'm afraid of is that we end up in a mix of > > various plugins, plugin releases and users might get confused where > > which plugin is how developed and by whom. > > OTOH while thinking about, this is already partly the case as it will > > be always with independent plugins especially when a plugin author > > doesn't use the geany-plugins Sourceforge project and instead use some > > other place for hosting. > > So, my worries about that are maybe exaggerated. Perhaps it's enough > > when we try to keep update to date with the index page at > > http://plugins.geany.org and http://www.geany.org/Support/Plugins as a > > some kind of reference list of known plugins. > > > I'm all for this. So, which plugin developers (and the plugins they > develop) are in favour of this move exactly? Perhaps we could have some > sort of page on the website documenting this?
That's just how it is now, and I don't think the status quo is nearly good enough. I've explained my point of view earlier in this thread. I am the author of the Tasks plugin, part of the "addons" set of small plugins. -- Bert Vermeulen [email protected] _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
