On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:06:45 +0200 Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project. > > > > It's true that I've used the workflow typical for a git project - from > geany web page, which offers both git and SVN repository I assumed > that I can chose either of them. If git is not supposed to be used, > then it should be removed from there because this makes things > confusing (or at least there should be a warning saying: "Don't use > the following git repository"). It's pretty clear from the GIT page that it's a read-only mirror. We don't have a writable GIT repo. > > Anyway, no problem for me to provide the changes in the form of > individual patches. I'll just wait for the main developer's opinion on > this before spamming with additional emails. Individual patches are better. That saves us time. Just looking through a Git repository isn't a good way to explain changes. Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
