On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 15:06, Nick Treleaven <nick.trelea...@btinternet.com> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:06:45 +0200 > Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Sure its easier if everyone is using git, but ATM this is an SVN project. >> > >> >> It's true that I've used the workflow typical for a git project - from >> geany web page, which offers both git and SVN repository I assumed >> that I can chose either of them. If git is not supposed to be used, >> then it should be removed from there because this makes things >> confusing (or at least there should be a warning saying: "Don't use >> the following git repository"). > > It's pretty clear from the GIT page that it's a read-only mirror. We > don't have a writable GIT repo. >
OK, I've just noticed: "Read-only mirrors of the SVN repositories, updated shortly after real commits in the SVN repository." But then I don't see the point of providing it if you cannot pull other people's clones of your repo. >> >> Anyway, no problem for me to provide the changes in the form of >> individual patches. I'll just wait for the main developer's opinion on >> this before spamming with additional emails. > > Individual patches are better. That saves us time. Just looking > through a Git repository isn't a good way to explain changes. > OK, will send them later today Regards, Jiri _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel