On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:17:54 +0200, Frank wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:14:57 +0400 > Eugene Arshinov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:11:05 +0200% > > Frank Lanitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:01:02 +0200 > > > Daniel Marjamäki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I have a few years of daily experience both with SVN and GIT. > > > > We use SVN at work and I use GIT for all my personal projects. > > > > I like GIT better than SVN. > > > > > > > > In my humble opinion you shouldn't switch unless you are unhappy > > > > with sourceforge / svn. > > > > > > I agree. For our current development process I don't see any big > > > need to change away from SVN. It will cost a lot of effort with > > > no extra profit adding. > > > > > > > I'd like to second that. And, while I use local Git repository > > for Geany, I'm completely happy with git-svn (and my separate SVN > > branch, of course :). > > I agree. Same here.
Well, if Frank doesn't want to and Nick doesn't mind, we maybe can indeed save us the whole trouble of discussing about switching :). Btw, my personal opinion on switching or not doesn't count much at all. The amount of future commits by me will be very small. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
