On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:42:56 +0100 Nick Treleaven <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:22:05 +0200 > Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I have a few years of daily experience both with SVN and > > > > > > GIT. We use SVN at work and I use GIT for all my personal > > > > > > projects. I like GIT better than SVN. > > > > > > > > > > > > In my humble opinion you shouldn't switch unless you are > > > > > > unhappy with sourceforge / svn. > > > > > > > > > > I agree. For our current development process I don't see any > > > > > big need to change away from SVN. It will cost a lot of > > > > > effort with no extra profit adding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to second that. And, while I use local Git repository > > > > for Geany, I'm completely happy with git-svn (and my separate > > > > SVN branch, of course :). > > > > > > I agree. Same here. > > > > Well, if Frank doesn't want to and Nick doesn't mind, we maybe can > > indeed save us the whole trouble of discussing about switching :). > > To be honest, it would be some hassle for me to switch. I only have > experience using Git locally, no push/pull/branches. But that > experience was great, I like the tool. > > So I think as Lex has suggested, that we shouldn't switch right now. > Maybe some time in the future. I don't have time ATM to > learn Git/investigate switching. > > Also as regards sourceforge, I agree with Enrico that we want to stay > with them for now at least. I completely second this. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpUCoZKtmRAZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
