Le 18/10/2011 22:51, Matthew Brush a écrit : > On 11-10-18 10:43 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:58:35 +0200, Colomban wrote: >> >>> Le 16/10/2011 12:07, Matthew Brush a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Does anyone know what effect merging the `gtkbuilder` branch would >>>> have on translations for the UI stuff? >>>> >>>> IIUC there is some translation capability build into >>>> Glade/GtkBuilder, so would we need to start using this? >>>> >>>> Do the current translations for Glade 2 strings work on the >>>> auto-generated C code (interface.[ch]) or are they on the Glade 2 >>>> file (geany.glade) directly? >>> >>> AFAIK, currently translated strings should be OK as far as we set the >> >> Well, I just checked po/POTFILES.in and there is src/interface.c >> listed, so this one is used for picking the translatable strings. >> And in po/POTFILES.skip geany.glade is explicitly listed to not be used >> for translatable strings with a comment that intltool would use it >> otherwise. So, I guess, as Colomban, that using the gtkbuilder XMl will >> work fine for intltool as well. >> > > Cool! > > Apparently by default gtk_builder_set_translation_domain() uses > gettext(), so are we all set then or do we need to set this to something > else?
Yep, it's enough for using the translated strings. We just need to make sure the strings are properly extracted from the .ui file (by intltool) so they new ones can be translated. _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
