On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net> wrote:
> On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: > > An explanation would be useful. > > > > For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with > > GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for > > GLib? > > Yes, and yes. > > > > If the answer to those is yes, it looks fine to apply as is. Even > > if the answer is no, the patch shouldn't harm anything besides > > cluttering up the code a little bit. > > Attached a new patch with a better commit message. With a view onto http://lists.uvena.de/pipermail/geany-devel/2012-May/006824.html Is this fine to append? Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpDJpMTMQyWZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
