Am 10.05.2012 02:20, schrieb Matthew Brush: > On 12-05-09 01:02 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:38:00 +0200 >> Quentin Glidic<sardemff7+ge...@sardemff7.net> wrote: >> >>> On 19/04/2012 16:43, Matthew Brush wrote: >>>> An explanation would be useful. >>>> >>>> For MultiTerm, presumably it's to avoid a clash with >>>> GLib.Menu/MenuItem? Is GIO stuff part of the implicit namespace for >>>> GLib? >>> >>> Yes, and yes. >>> >>> >>>> If the answer to those is yes, it looks fine to apply as is. Even >>>> if the answer is no, the patch shouldn't harm anything besides >>>> cluttering up the code a little bit. >>> >>> Attached a new patch with a better commit message. >> >> With a view onto >> http://lists.uvena.de/pipermail/geany-devel/2012-May/006824.html >> Is this fine to append? >> > > Yeah it's fine.
OK. will add it then later this week - I hope I find some time by today CEST but cannot give any guarantee. Cheers, Frank _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel