Am 16.07.2012 16:41, schrieb Hong Xu:
On 2012/7/15 20:28, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 21:56:32 +1000
Lex Trotman <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:

BTW you mentioned a third party library, but you didn't say what
library.  It would of course have to have a suitable license to allow
it to be included.

Yes. I missed that too. Most plugins are GPL2+ so it needs to be also
GPL2+... BSD should also be fine in most cases. But LGPL could be
problematic.



I prefer Simplified BSD License for this plugin. What do you mean it should be fine for "most" cases? Could you explain more?

The 2-clause BSD is always fun. As is LGPLv2+.

Best regards.
_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel

Reply via email to