> We might want to go to 1.01 for this since it's a pretty small change. I'm not > sure what our revision frequency will look like going forward. I agree that it's a small change, but maybe we should use "1.0.1" instead? That would be more in keeping with Gears version numbers, which don't use leading zeros.
> Is there a convention for when to update the major version, and when to update > the minor version? Just curious. No, we don't have a formal convention. Perhaps we should bump to "1.1" when we add the access_token field, and reserve changes to the major version for fundamental changes to the structure of the format. Steve
