Wonderful work! really. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:53 PM, briandunnington <[email protected]>wrote:
> > you might check out the Vortex Offline library (http:// > groups.google.com/group/gears-users/browse_thread/thread/ > 599cc041912e355b/c133366573001abb? > hl=en&lnk=gst&q=vortex#c133366573001abb) - it is essentially the > dojo.offline stuff minus dojo, which i believe is what you are looking > for. > > i havent updated the code in awhile and there have been a few Gears > releases since, but the code should still work for what you are after. > > > On Feb 18, 6:07 pm, robertlan <[email protected]> wrote: > > dojox.offline developed by Brad Neuberg is extremely wonderful, which > > enables quickest and simpliest way to enable offline support of a > > website. Apparently it relies on not only google Gears, but also dojo > > core. > > > > My question is: > > > > Can a simple and small framework, like dojox.offline, be seperated > > from dojo core? > > > > Then, this framework could be used when: > > 1. Mobile offline support, where we should titrate all to minimal, and > > dojo core is too big. > > 2. Wherever you do not want to use dojo core. > > > > I did not learn much about original Gears API. Maybe for mobile > > offline case, I should go back to study and dig into Gears API. :-) >
