On 3/15/07, Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am also mulling over DJ's points about a "use" license vs. a "distrbution" license. It's a different -- and clearer -- approach than the FSF's exemption from the GPL. I like it, but must decide if we need more legalism. That is, what does "use" mean? If I take all of DJ's footprints and sell them to Microsoft for $10,000, that's a "use" isn't it? Yes, I am playing with words and meanings, but that's what laywers do all the time.
I like DJ's approach as well. How about a statement of intent --- The intent of this license is to allow for distribution of these symbols individually or in a collection .... <insert T's & C's here >. Usage of these symbols, other than distribution, is unrestricted. (* jcl *) -- http://www.luciani.org _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
