Timmerman, Bert wrote:
Hi all,
If "we" indeed were to develop the greatest library in the world ...
Well, let us get there first, and then wounder if achieving all this did
go unnoticed by the big commercial EDA companies.
My point, which was not explained as well as it could have been, was if
the scenarios are not undesirable, there's no reason to place the
footprints under anything more restrictive than a BSD license.
I'd like to place all my footprints and symbols under the same license
as gEDA, so I hope this issue gets worked out, but it won't be if the
community (us) doesn't even know what we want to allow and disallow.
Cory Cross
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
