On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Peter TB Brett wrote: > Hi folks, > > I wish to propose the following compromise: > > - Implement the new embedding system (separate symbol definition and > instantiation, and checks that the embedded symbol matches the library > symbol). I don't think anyone has disputed that this is a good idea. > > - However, don't embed by default (but add an option which turns it on, and > make an obvious GUI for embedding/unembedding symbols). > > Does this meet the sanity check?
As long as embedding is *not* the default, it makes sense to me. Stuart _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
