DJ Delorie wrote: > Why project-in-file at all? > > Why not define the "project" as "this directory" ? > > Various sub-projects could exist in the same directory, sharing a > symbol/footprint database. Well-known file extensions could be used > to map files to various control purposes (I use "*.prj" for every > gschem->pcb grouping). > > That way, we retain the unix file/script design, we get a heirarchy > for free, and yet it's self-contained.
The is the way I like the best. If a subcontractor gets a zipped or tarred dir, he has everything he needs to work, (besides the tool distribution files and dirs installed). John G -- Ecosensory Austin TX _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
