Hi Ales, Great architectural foresight. After looking at other GPL'ed EDA tools, gEDA shines in that it can be used for hobbyist, educational tools, and currently it has uninhibiting capabilities and features including the support of "highly complex hierarchical directory structure", all of which are essential for design of multimillion transistors VLSI chip.
As gEDA evolves, I would like to see this tradition continues, and the capabilities not diminished or sacrificed. Best Regards, Paul Tan -----Original Message----- From: Ales Hvezda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gEDA developer mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 4:19 pm Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: [RFC] Embedding/archiving compromise > > Why project-in-file at all? > > Why not define the "project" as "this directory" ? This is pretty much the philosophy of gEDA/gaf from the beginning. I intentionally didn't define what a "design" or "project" really means. I left that up to the end users to pick what works for them. Some people wanted a highly complex hierarchical directory structure while others just wanted a flat single directory. -Ales _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev ________________________________________________________________________ Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
