Bernd Jendrissek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 20, 2007 6:41 PM, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think the workflow needs to be: >> >> * user picks generic symbol for initial schematics >> >> * user picks details that work for that generic symbol. > > Excuse me for tooting my own horn here, but has anyone tried my > slotting patch [1]? It allows you to place generic symbols and then > later specialize them by *linking* (not replacing!) them to a "heavy" > part symbol that contains all the interesting attributes. There's > also a mechanism to ensure that slots are compatible with the symbols > you put into them - basically just a check that any attributes that > exist in both the light and the heavy part, match.
That is what I was looking for. I have lot of dos during the holyday, but I'll get back to it! Thank you for pointing that out! > I'll have to work on the "slot chooser" dialog to teach it to query > the component library for candidate "heavy" symbols that have > compatible slots, instead of looking only at components that are > already on the schematic. > > [1] http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-gaf/berndj.git > There's only abstract/opamp.sym and linear/lm324-slots.sym to serve as > examples though! Could you please point out how can I apply that patch? Thanks, -- Levente http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
