John Doty wrote: > On Jun 3, 2008, at 10:11 AM, der Mouse wrote: > >>>> Console based processing would have to work as usual, perhaps >>>> throwing a stderr / stdout warning that there might be out-dated >>>> footprints for certain files. >>> Unacceptable. In a large project, such warnings are lost in the >>> spew. >> Then surely the right thing to do is clean up the spew! > > Yeah, except nobody ever really achieves that with make. > >> Even if it >> means a grep -v to throws out the commands reported by make...or using >> @ on the commands you don't want to see, if you can hack the Makefile. >> >>> Some customers imagine hermetic packages improve reliability, >> And, don't they...for some environments? > > Maybe if you're operating your circuits in high pressure steam. But > in space? Nope. There's a widespread fervent *faith* that hermetic > packages are more reliable, but actual experience with operation of > electronics in space tell a different tale.
Is it possible for you to elaborate on that? Can you point me to any reference material on the subject? At my place of work we are severely constrained by IC technology selection criteria as specified by a *true believer* in the ways of hermetic sealing. > >> /~\ The ASCII der Mouse >> \ / Ribbon Campaign >> X Against HTML [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geda-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >______________________________________________ > geda-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev > Best regards Sandy Thom _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
