On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:02:38 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: > We need a hybrid approach, where the in-PCB cached version is retained, > yet PCB can inform you / allow you to mass-update footprints which have > changed on disk.
Full ack. The inability to do an update of footprints on demand is one of my favorite missing features with pcb. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak http://lilalaser.de/blog _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
