Hello Bernd, Bernd Jendrissek writes: > [...] > Is this really necessary now that the repository is in git? You could > have a mini-branch of patches no matter how egregious each individual > change, as long as the final result is "perfect", and then *merge* > that into master. This way master moves atomically from one "perfect" > state to another "perfect" state, but the diff between the two states > can still be decomposed into individual contributor patches (unlike > CVS where you get only one big kilo-patch).
I am not familiar enough with git to comment on your solution (far less testing it). Still if when looking at the history of master I can see two patches with titles "Modified toolbar to use GtkIconFactory for icon" and then "Various cleanup and fixes", even on a branch of their own, that is not good. Regards, Patrick _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
