On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Point me to the built .deb, or .diff.gz and I'll test it.
The diff.gz is attached to the bug report[1] itself. I have also uploaded the i386 deb on my server in the link below. http://www.tuxmaniac.com/work/packages/geda-gnetlist_1.4.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb > Alternatively... there is 1.4.1 coming out "soon", which contains this > and other minor fixes. What would be the release deadline to get that > into Intrepid? (I appreciate it is easier if Debian package it first). Yes. I completely agree with Debian packaging it first. But I think we will be missing the Intrepid freeze. But not sure. > Good idea to SRU the patch for Hardy, although I don't think I've heard > any complaints about the broken backends - they can't be widely used. Since Hardy is a LTS, I think even if we have'nt received much complaints, its better to SRU the patch. So, once the patch is tested, I will rise the necessary procedures for an SRU. Thanks Peter for all the support. [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geda-gnetlist/+bug/207760 With Kind Regards, Aanjhan _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
