On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 19:19 +0530, Aanjhan R wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 09:57 +0530, Aanjhan R wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Point me to the built .deb, or .diff.gz and I'll test it. > >> > >> The diff.gz is attached to the bug report[1] itself. I have also > >> uploaded the i386 deb on my server in the link below. > >> http://www.tuxmaniac.com/work/packages/geda-gnetlist_1.4.0-2ubuntu1_i386.deb > > > > Can you try rebuilding that on a Hardy PPA or pbuilder environment? > > > > The deb doesnt work on Hardy. I forgot to mention that. It was built > on a Intrepid pbuilder since a few libs were upgraded in Debian. > > > (Or do both Hardy and Intrepid get geda-gnetlist_1.4.0-2ubuntu1 ?) > > No. On Hardy it is 1.4.0-1 and Intrepid currently has 1.4.0-2build2. > Only the package was rebuilt since the guile libs were upgraded. Now > since there is some source package changes, I have renamed it to > geda-gnetlist_1.4.0-2ubuntu1 (which is not yet in the Ubuntu repos)
I just meant.. what version number would hardy get when you SRU? Is it the same number as the version in Intrepid which is SRU'd (skipping a version number in Hardy), or do Intrepid and Hardy get different version numbers for effectively the same package? > I will build on Hardy and give the link to the .deb soon. No (real) need to do that. I build the package myself and found it worked. (Commented on the launchpad bug to say so too). If you want me to test an officially built .deb from hardy-proposed, (is that where the packages are staged - I can't remember), I can do that. Best regards, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
