On Sunday 28 September 2008 01:14:27 Peter Clifton wrote: > > >Note, that the last "1" on the "p ...." line means "one further line of > > >path string. You'd want to drop that if you moved to the [...] syntax. > > > > I do like the multi-line syntax better (with an added line count). > > Though we have a nice mix of things (text with count, attributes/embedded > > symbols with delimiters, and pictures that end with a dot). > > I'm tired. Are you saying you prefer without the "[]", but that we > should emit each segment on multiple lines by default?
I support this, using the num_lines field as a num_segments check.
I'm not wildly keen on re-using [], TBH. I feel that a [] should always
imply "sub-schematic", i.e. containing normal gEDA objects.
Just my tuppence worth.
Peter
--
Peter Brett
Electronic Systems Engineer
Integral Informatics Ltd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
