[snip]
>I'd very much prefer that we keep all the tools in the gEDA suite licensable
>under the GPLv2+, until it's decided to move them *as a whole* to GPLv3+.
I still haven't seen definitive written statement from anybody
of _how_ you do that (move from GPLv2 and later to GPLv3) if a project
has hundreds of copyright holders. If somebody has a link, then please
share. I'm not convinced that anybody can just declare a wholesale move
to GPLv3 even with the "and later" clause. That's why I would love to
see something definitive from the FSF (maybe it's in the FAQ already and
I've overlooked it).
[snip]
>Ales' input is very much required here.
It would be nice if we didn't have any GPLv3 projects inside of
gEDA/gaf for now (for all the reasons mentioned). If this is a problem,
please let us know why and maybe we can come to some sort of compromise.
-Ales
_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
