Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 08:02:59AM -0800, David Grant wrote:
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Bugzilla appears to be a shit to me.
To you, yes. Many others find it invaluable such as kde, gnome,
mozilla, gentoo, all of the biggest projects in open source. I'm not
Size is irrelevant regarding quality. China is big. Russia is big.
Microsoft is
big.
Um yeah, but regardless, you can substitue the word "biggest" for
"highest quality" in my sentence and it is still truth.
surprised that sourceforge is shit though. I didn't know they had
bugzilla by the way, I thought they used their own system.
Responds to an upload of 4MB
attachment with "invalid filename". "webp.ppm" is probably an invalid
filename on the filesystem Sourceforge runs on.
I assume webp.ppm is a text file? Did you classify it as plain text?
It is a binary file. pcb.sourceforge.net -> Bugs -> Submit New doesn't
have any tickbox for any file classification nor my browser has.
Perhaps the file was too big (which can probably be fixed by changing a
setting on the server). Try sending a small text file with that file
extension.
Tried with Links and Mozilla
so it doesn't seem to be a problem of browser.
Actually, it appears to be a shit not only to me:
http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=8361
I recommend it to be thrown out of window and replaced with a mailing list.
Like the Debian big system? ugh...
What do you mean? Throuwn out like Debian big system or mailing list
like the Debian big system?
Sorry I meant to say Debian bug system. I'm referring to their bug
system which is annoying and relies quite a bit on email if I remember
correctly.
--
David J. Grant
http://www.davidgrant.ca:81
begin:vcard
fn:David Grant
n:Grant;David
adr:;;;Richmond;BC;;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.davidgrant.ca
version:2.1
end:vcard
