Hi Stuart,
[snip]
> /* visit rc files in order */
> /* Changed by SDB 1.2.2005 in response to Peter Kaiser's bug report.
> * Read gafrc files first */
> found_rc |= g_rc_parse_system_rc("gafrc");
> found_rc |= g_rc_parse_home_rc("gafrc");
> found_rc |= g_rc_parse_local_rc("gafrc");
> /* continue support for individual rc files for each program. */
> found_rc |= g_rc_parse_system_rc(rcname);
> found_rc |= g_rc_parse_home_rc(rcname);
> found_rc |= g_rc_parse_local_rc(rcname);
[snip]
I would rather have the order like this:
/* visit rc files in order */
found_rc |= g_rc_parse_system_rc(rcname);
found_rc |= g_rc_parse_home_rc(rcname);
found_rc |= g_rc_parse_home_rc("gafrc");
found_rc |= g_rc_parse_local_rc(rcname);
found_rc |= g_rc_parse_gaf_rc();
I think the gafrc files should be read after the existing rc
files, but in this order: system-wide, user-wide, local.
I think that will satisfiy the request to search for ~/.gEDA/gafrc.
I really don't see a need for a system-gafrc since there already exists
a system-commonrc.
[snip]
>1. Can you think of any reason why this shouldn't be done this way?
>I found that in the event that no gafrc lives anywhere, the program
>complains, but doesn't do anything bad. However, I want to make sure
>I am not doing something foolish.
Sounds like a reasonable request. I didn't add a search for
~/.gEDA/gafrc since I didn't think it was needed, but I was wrong.
>2. Ales, assuming this change is OK, what is your policy w.r.t. folks
>checking stuff into libgeda & other CVS respositories. Would you
>prefer to review it first, or should I just go ahead and check it in?
>If you don't mind, I may just go into libgeda and make some other
>changes too, but I don't want to cause any problems or step on any
>toes.
Go right ahead and make the changes. I'll review the changes
when I update. :)
-Ales
