Hi All,
>$system/gafrc
>$home/gafrc
>./gafrc
>$system/gschemrc
>$home/gschemrc
>./gschemrc
>
Okay this order is fine with me too. I really didn't have
a good reason for advocating the other way.
>It works fine. The only problem is that I get a warning when it tries
>to find the "required system-gafrc" file:
This message will go away once you rename the system-commonrc
to system-gafrc, right?
[snip]
>I like Peter's suggestion that the system-commonrc become the
>system-gafrc. This is a good first step on the road to migrating
>towards using gafrc everywhere & deprecating the old g[schem | netlist
>| attrib | symcheck]rc system. It does require some changes to the
>*rc.in files -- particularly in the symbols directory -- but that I
>don't mind doing.
Okay.
>
>I don't think the old system should go away; that might cause breakage
>of legacy schematics. However, we can incorporate the new gafrc
>system while deprecating the old system for new designs.
I don't think we will ever be able to get rid of the other rc files,
mainly because things that are gschem specific have to go somewhere.
>
>One question: If I make changes to libgeda, I would like to have
>folks test my stuff. Are there any volunteers out there who are
>willing to get stuff out of CVS, build it and test it when I post an
>update? Peter?
I'll review and test the changes. Feel free to checkin the changes
when you get a chance.
>In general, it would be a good thing to have a few beta testers who
>can verify that the code in CVS builds reliability.
If you break CVS, don't worry about it. Things are easily fixed.
Thanks.
-Ales
