Hi Ales & all,

> >I have glib version 2.2.3 installed.
> >Mmhh, I am not planing to update my old computer. 
> 
>       Is this still an open issue?  It would be shame to break
> compatibility with 2.2.x over something as silly as "g_setenv".

I agree that we shouldn't break GTK-2.X compatibility; my preference
is that gEDA work for gtk-2.x for x = 0 -- 4 and beyond.

However, I want to offer a slightly different way of looking at this.
As developers, we tend to think "we should support gtk-2.x".  However,
*users* tend to think "I have Red Hat 9 (or whatever), will gEDA work
on my machine?"  That is, maybe we could take a look at the common
distributions, and select some subset of them to support.   Here is a
suggested list of common distributions which we could target:

RH9
FC1 -- 3 (and beyond)
Debian (which rev?)
SuSE 9.X (X = 0, 1, 2 and beyond)
Gentoo (which rev?)

Have I missed any common distributions?

With a set of "officially" supported distributions, we could then
figure out which prerequisite packages we can write against.  This
would help in situations like that which we apparently have now:  a
patch seems to have broken gEDA for some -- but not all -- users.

Just a thought . . . .

Stuart

Reply via email to