> I meant having two kind of files:
>       - One storing the graphical symbol.
>      - One which inherits the graphical symbol from the latter. This one
> includes the necessary attributes: footprint, device, and so on.

I misunderstood. This sounds like a good idea.

>> Scalable symbols would be nice. Currently I use names like LED.sym,
>> LED-small.sym, CAP.sym, CAP-small.sym which works fine.


> ATM I don't know how it would be implemented. This feature will only
> scale the graphical symbol, and not the text, if we want to preserve the
> readability. Regarding the graphical symbol, it can only be scaled by a
> given factor, maybe 50%, in order to keep the pin to pin spacing within
> the grid. Am I right?

If you start with the small symbol and scale up you will always be on
grid (assuming the small symbol was on grid).

One more comment on the backups --- I liked the way that the VAX did the
backups with a numerical suffix and a manual purge command. As Bob Paddock
mentioned sometimes you don't immediately realize that you need the backup.

(* jcl *)

On 10/24/05, Carlos Nieves Ónega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El dom, 23-10-2005 a las 07:51 -0400, John Luciani escribió:
> > > Heavy/light symbols
> >
> > If you want to display correct pin numbers you need to specify a
> > package type for some symbols. For example: the LM326-2.5 reference
> > has two packages --- DIP8 and TO-92 with the following pin
> > numbers:
> >
> >           Pin Numbers
> >
> >           TO-92  DIP8
> > Anode      1      4
> > Cathode    2      8
> > Adj        3      5
>
> I meant having two kind of files:
>         - One storing the graphical symbol.
>         - One which inherits the graphical symbol from the latter. This one
> includes the necessary attributes: footprint, device, and so on.
>
> In the example you wrote, there would be a LM326-1.sym symbol with only
> the graphical representation, and maybe some common attributes.
> Then, there would be one LM326_TO92-1.sym symbol and one
> LM326_DIP8-1.sym symbol. Each one have its own attributes, so there's no
> footprint conflict, and both include the LM326-1.sym as a schematic
> include it now: without copying its contents. This way, if you change
> the LM326-1.sym symbol, the graphical symbol of the other two will
> change, but not their attributes (they are specified within each one,
> and not in the LM326-1.sym file).
>
> > Sometimes it useful to have different sizes of the same symbol.  If I
> > have a schematic containing an LED driver connected to 16 LEDs I would
> > use a small LED symbol to improve schematic readability. If a
> > component needs many decoupling capacitors at specific pins (Chipcon
> > radios) it is useful to use a small capacitor symbol.
> >
> > Scalable symbols would be nice. Currently I use names like LED.sym,
> > LED-small.sym, CAP.sym, CAP-small.sym which works fine.
> [snip]
>
> ATM I don't know how it would be implemented. This feature will only
> scale the graphical symbol, and not the text, if we want to preserve the
> readability. Regarding the graphical symbol, it can only be scaled by a
> given factor, maybe 50%, in order to keep the pin to pin spacing within
> the grid. Am I right?
>
> Carlos
>
>


--
http://www.luciani.org

Reply via email to