Sorry for the top post. Funny you should ask about FC5 and the installer. The 20060124 install CD has older programs which would choke the install on the newer FC5. Also, Red Hat has once again boned everybody by changing what is installed and what is not on FC5.
Anyway, I am even now busy testing an upgraded installer with new stuff on it. If you can wait a day or two I will put a preview iso on my website and make an announcement to the list. It won't necessarily have the latest/greatest gEDA/gaf (which is awaiting Ales's release), but it will have plenty of other good stuff. And it should run to completion also! Stuart On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Patrick Doyle wrote:
Are there folks on this list who are using FC5? If so, what is the recommended approach for installing the gEDA suite on an FC5 box? I am asking because I tried the most straightforward approach (installing from the CD) and ran into a few problems. So far, they don't seem too insurmountable, but I've learned through bitter experience to start asking questions sooner, rather than later. The first issue I ran into was that the installer said I needed to have wxGTK installed, and offered to install it for me from the CD. I thought to myself, "Gee, in 2006 on an FC5 box, I should be able to just grab the latest from a repository", so I $ sudo yum install wxGTK and reran the installer, and failed in exactly the same place! Apparently, the wxGTK that gets installed by yum on an FC5 box (version 2.6.3.2.2.fc5) does not include the "wx-config" utility, which is what the installer searched for to determined if wxGTK was installed. I tried $ sudo yum whatprovides wx-config and found that it doesn't exist in any of the packages that yum could find. (BTW, I find it personally annoying that I have to execute the "whatprovides" command as root, but that's a topic for another forum). This wasn't a serious problem, I just uninstalled wxGTK and let the installer install it's own, but I thought I would mention it. I restarted the install and let it go its merry way while I went to bed last night and got up this morning to find that it failed in its attempt to compile "gnucap". Here is where things started going bad: (cd O; make -k) make[2]: Entering directory `/home/wpd/geda-sources/gnucap/gnucap-2006-01-17/src/O' g++ -DHAS_READLINE -DUNIX -O2 -DNDEBUG -I.. -I. -W -c ../md.cc g++ -DHAS_READLINE -DUNIX -O2 -DNDEBUG -I.. -I. -W -c ../globals.cc ../e_card.h: In function $.1???CARD_LIST::fat_iterator findbranch(CS&, CARD_LIST*)???: ../e_card.h:152: error: cannot convert ???CARD_LIST::fat_iterator??? to ???CARD_LIST*??? for argument ???2??? to ???CARD_LIST::fat_iterator findbranch(CS&, CARD_LIST*)??? ../e_compon.h: In member function ???void COMPONENT::attach_common(COMMON_COMPONENT*)???: ../e_compon.h:139: error: ???::attach_common??? has not been declared ../e_compon.h: In member function ???void COMPONENT::detach_common()???: ../e_compon.h:140: error: ???::detach_common??? has not been declared make[2]: *** [globals.o] Error 1 ... When I sit down to play with this some more this evening I can either start trying to figure out what went wrong, or I can post a message now and see if others have found and worked around this issue in the past. Usually, I start with plan (a), but I thought I would try plan (b) this time :-) Seriously... what do folks recommend for compiling and/or running the gEDA suite on an FC5 box? I see that there are precompiled RPMs available, and I might go with that, at least to get started, but I anticipate, from having lurked on the list for a couple of weeks (gee, I wish I had tried this a couple of months ago so that I would have felt comfortable showing up on DJ's doorstep last weekend, oh well), that there are newer features in the CVS tree that I might want to try, so I would prefer to start from a source compile and be able to tweak it as needed. Alternatively, if 98% of the folks on this list are running some other distro, it would probably behoove me to run the same distro, so as to minimize the probability of these sorts of things happening as I play with the source (assuming things get to that point). Any thoughts? --wpd _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
