Ales Hvezda wrote: >> Nobody said there was. But if you're going to undermine any and every > > Okay, so what is with this statement: > >> ... I have to cast my vote for OCaml or Haskel ... > > seems like you are trying to vote for something? Again this > thread is about the "fritzing" project, not about language choices (yes, > as I said before, I was silly to think that a quip about "religious > grounds" would go unnoticed by the a certain population of this list). > > Btw, since we are talking about OCaml and Haskel, please post a > URL to a "non-trival real world free software" code base written in > either one of these languages that I can evaluate. Thanks.
and my typical question.. are those really well supported on a wide variety of operating systems on a wide variety of hardware platforms? Its painful enough to deal with non-portable software on something which is not a x86-linux box (you mean everything isn't 32-bit little endian?) but its an order of magnitude worse at least if the toolchain isn't well supported. Please note, I'm not claiming haskel and OCaml have this problem, but I always wonder when its a new language. -Dan _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
