Am Samstag, den 22.09.2007, 19:45 +0100 schrieb Peter Clifton: > > There are various "heavy" symbols, such as lm741-1.sym. >
Indeed, I missed it because these symbols are stored in different directories: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gEDA/DAQ-Board $ locate lm741 /usr/share/gEDA/sym/linear/lm741-1.sym [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gEDA/DAQ-Board $ locate opamp /usr/share/gEDA/sym/analog/dual-opamp-1.sym /usr/share/gEDA/sym/analog/opamp-1.sym /usr/share/gEDA/sym/analog/opamp-2.sym /usr/share/gEDA/sym/analog/quad_opamp-1.sym I still think that a symbol with a general name like opamp should be related to a general package. > It is a well known problem though, the mapping between a light symbol > and a real package is not something which is easily solved. > Yes, I know the discussion about heavy and light symbols. For me this is not really a problem, I was only confused. Maybe we should store heavy and light symbols in different locations. (For me it was not obvious after finding opamp-1.sym (and opamp-2.sym) to search for lm741 to find an ordinary DIP8 OpAmp). Best regards Stefan Salewski _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
