> Imagine, that you have a 431 pin BGA. Would you include 431 times > the same padstack in the footprint? I think one should bother with > the whatever shape, and size of the stencil, copper, mask, paste > layers. Those are just "pads". Then we could link pads to a > padstack, and the padstacks into the footprint.
For sanity's sake, let's let a footprint define its pad stacks for its own pads, rather than trying to maintain a global cache of padstacks. Then, a BGA footprint would have one "here's what my pads look like" and 431 copies of "put one here". _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
