I have no problem with adding a GIT repo for gerbv. However, there are only 3 active developers right now, so I am not sure if we need the power of git as opposed to SF's crusty old CVS system.
You are correct, it makes no sense to make it part of gEDA/gaf. Gerbv is a stand-alone project. OTOH, it does belong in any bundled version of the gEDA Suite, including my old install CD (if I ever do another one), the CUED live CD, the Fedora Electronics distro, etc. If there is a swell of popular demand, then we can communicate privately about getting a git repo set up. Cheers, Stuart Right On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Peter TB Brett wrote: > On Wednesday 28 November 2007 20:15:12 Peter Clifton wrote: > >> Please can we consider moving this to GIT under the umbrella of the >> gEDA/gaf project (or even a perhaps GIT repo), as this has proven >> invaluable in many cases with gEDA since (and even before) we switched. >> I'm biased, as I love GIT - and am starting to feel I know it, but there >> are simply things you can't do with CVS. > > I'd be really happy to see this added as a repo on git.gpleda.org -- but I > don't think it would make sense for it to be added into the gaf repository. > > Peter > > > -- > Peter Brett > > Electronic Systems Engineer > Integral Informatics Ltd > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
