Steven Ball wrote: > If we decide that heavy symbols are really needed, it would be nice to > have a footprint browser in gschem or something that helps specify > when you place the symbol on the schematic that I want this footprint, > and here's a preview of what it would look like. Would save a lot of > flipping back and forth. > > -hamster
Careful. After all that agreeing with Steve, you're saying heavy symbols as if they drove it. He's saying they should only be generated by "it". I don't think we'll find "it" on ebay. John Griessen PS Why doesn't Steve use spells checkers? Because he knows we know what he's talking about, and time is precious. -- Ecosensory Austin TX _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
