On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:42:59PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > I'm not arguing to replace gattrib though. Ivan Stankovic is / was doing > work on gattrib, so I'd expect to see some improvements there in due > course.
Yes, I have been working on a gattrib rewrite and I've just barely got to load/save component attribs. I have some useful ideas for improving gattrib in general, but the progress is really slow (I'm currently finishing my thesis). So don't expect anything soon. (The good news is I've been able to greatly reduce code size, at least for those features that are implemented.) Another thing is that I've not yet fixed the new gattrib architecture which seems like a good idea, given the recent discussions on light vs. heavy symbols and part databases. Perhaps it would be best to just wait for a consensus on geda-user (I'm not sure if that's possible, though, but I _am_ hoping) and then begin coding? -- Ivan Stankovic, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"; _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
