Well hierarchicaly I use presidence to determine the netname. The netname is set from the top out.
So no having multiple netnames for the same net shouldn't always trigger a drc error. There should be a rule for which name to use under certain circumstances. One case where I used multiple net names for a single net was when a symbol had hidden pins for VCC and VDD. I had a power net for V3.3 and I conected a power symbol with its own hidden net of VCC to the V3.3 Net just so that the symbol with the hidden nets would be added to the net. I can not vouch if this would work for stock geda. And now I am wondering if I broke this in my latest efforts So I will go and check. Steve Meier On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 14:44 -0700, Andy Peters wrote: > On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:47 AM, Klaus Rudolph wrote: > > > Having multiple netnames should not be a problem and work "sometimes". > > Methinks that having multiple netnames for the same net should ALWAYS > trigger a DRC error. > > -a > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
