Ahh, Obvious difference is in the usage.
net=5V:3 names the net and attaches it to a specific pin. netname=5V Steve Meier On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 14:37 -0800, Steve Meier wrote: > I know I know the next few things are obvious.... > > A net is a collection of pins that should be connected with a conductor. > > A net has a name. > > gschem gives you all possible registered attributes when you decide to > use one. Thus if you decide to edit a net segment and attach an > attribute you can pick either net or netname. > > I tend to just use the net attribute but looking at the aformentioned > reference I relize that others would be using netname for attribing (is > that a legal verb) a segment. > > I think that this implies that support for both net and netname has to > continue but would it be acceptable to autoconvert either way force > segments to have netname from net, force component to have net from > netname? Maybe with a warning? > > And did I get the presidence correct? > > Nets from component net attrib is greater then netnames from segments > which is greater then automatic net name? > > Steve Meier > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 16:43 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > "net" is the name of a net you connect to. > > > > "netname" is the name of the net you *are*. > > > > So, "net" has-a "netname", symbol connects-to "net". > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geda-user mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
