if we open a PCB file that doesn't specify an annulus min width then the annulus min width should be set to the min width of the copper lines.
I like the idea of expanding the vendor files to provide for the DRC and drill mappings, making it a file that has the parameters seems like a good idea. Hardkrash On Mar 14, 2008, at 2:57 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I am not opposed to changing it to only apply the minimum annulus >> test >> on holes. I think the historic reason is pcb used to only have the >> min >> width parameter. But now that we've had the min annulus parameter >> for a >> while we should probably flip the switch. Any objections? > > No objections from me. At some point we should expand the DRC > parameters, too, but I'd rather change to a more flexible file format > first so we don't have to keep adding positional parameters :-P > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
