John Griessen wrote: > Stefan Salewski wrote: > >> But there are some existing gschem-symbols with these net-attributes... >> >> OK, maybe I should make a local copy and remove the hidden nets. > > > Yes. Make that change to match your style and do it consistently > to avoid debugging.
Since I dislike having "house keeping" i/o cluttering up the symbol, what I've (mostly) converted to is breaking symbols into at least two pieces, one for power supply, and one (or more) for function. So if you copy a symbol with hidden nets, simply remove the nets. Then the new symbol will drop into place where ever the original was. Make another symbol for power supply, and assign it the same refdes when you place it. -dave _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
