On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:06 PM, r<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:52 PM, John P. Doty<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. But you if you thing gEDA is restricted to generating flat
>> netlists, you don't understand it. You can't improve what you don't
>> understand.
>> [...]
>> You're wrong. Haven't you studied spice-sdb?
>
> John, I think everyone here has already got your point. Don't
> understand me wrong, I'm glad the current solution works for you but I
> hope you will agree that different people may have different needs.
>
> I, for one, am very happy that someone has stepped forward and wrote a
> netlister that is better suited to my needs. Whether Anthony has
> reused gnetlist or not - I couldn't care less. I haven't been using it
> (and thus the whole geda) anyway.
>
> Regards,
> -r.

Thanks I appreciate it. Just for clarification I have not reused
gnetlist at all the program has no dependencies. It's own netlister.

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Reply via email to