On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:32:15 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Maybe what you need instead of a complete parts list is a depends-on > specification,
Sounds good. There is no change for the simple case, say opamp plus opamp power symbol. And it will work for your more sophisticated strategy too. >> 6) gschem should read the parts list and insert all parts at once. > > I don't see the point in this It makes sure, all dependent symbols are in the schematic and get the same refdes. I understand, that this will be no much use in your case. The feature should be optional then. >> Next step would be to treat slotted components like multi-part symbols. >> >> > I've always thought that slotting was just a special case of > multi-symbol, where the two symbols were visually identical. Well, slots are not only visually identical, but can be swapped. This wouldn't mix well with multi part symbols. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
