On Aug 3, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote: > On Monday 03 August 2009 20:31:45 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: >> On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:47:32 -0500, John Griessen wrote: >>> To let gsch2pcb run and update an open instance of PCB would be a >>> nice >>> feature... >> >> Like xgsch2pcb does? > > Shh, kmk, it's got a *GUI* and uses *IPC*.
And what's wrong with a GUI *here*? You can't script this, and an interactive user is necessarily in a graphical pcb world to which xgsch2pcb is married anyway. IPC is often a good thing. Clean interfaces, compartmentalization, parallelism. I've been using asynchronous OO for 35 years: longer than it's had a name and been recognized as a separate kind of programming (but no, I didn't invent it). > You'll scare him away with talk of > such advanced wizardry! Scheme seems to be the chief scarecrow here. Make gets some attention too. > > Peter :-P > > -- > Peter Brett <[email protected]> > Remote Sensing Research Group > Surrey Space Centre > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
