I favor gpleda. spice files aren't really symbols and adding them to gedasymbols would confuse that website's purpose. But gpleda is a multipurpose website and our spice library would fit nicely there. -Alan
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:18:41 +0200, Werner Hoch wrote: > >>> How about gedasymbols.org? >> >> I think gedasymbols is not the right place. The spicelib does not >> provide any model or symbol. > > gedasymbols hosts scripts and documentation too. I'd prefer to find all > (most) resources for my favortite EDA system at one place. There are > already more sites related to geda tools than I can point my fingers to. > > >> ... and I prefer git over cvs for such a project. > > Maybe gpleda is an option. > > ---<(kaimartin)>--- > -- > Kai-Martin Knaak > Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
