> I favor gpleda. spice files aren't really symbols and adding them > to gedasymbols would confuse that website's purpose.
Hmmm... what exactly is gedasymbol's "purpose" ? It started as just symbols, then symbols and footprints, then symbols, footprints, and tools, now symbols, footprints, tools, and plugins... I think, now, *any* user-contributed "things" that go into geda-built designs, or get added to geda tools, are acceptable. It's a useful dichotomy - gpleda hosts "official" stuff, gedasymbols hosts "unofficial" stuff. So a official spice lib - gpleda. User-contributed spice models - gedasymbols. Sound reasonable? I probably should figure out how to migrate to git, though, or something more modern than cvs. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
