(I'm sorry, the mailer threw the message to spam) On 11/11/09, Peter Clifton <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like the teardrop plugin's use of arbitrary angle arcs has > exposed a bug in the the intersection calculation of arcs. (And their > bounding boxes look to be wrong as well).
I don't think the bounding boxes are wrong (the boxes of the lines on the same board are `widened' in a similar way), it is the check that is not strictly correct. > I _hate_ arcs and related geometry.. they caused me no end of grief in > gschem, so I'm not feeling keen to dig into the code and debug it > myself! Arcs are OK, unless they are ellipsoidal; in that case they can't survive rotation by arbitrary angles. Cheers, Ineiev _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
