Chris Cole wrote:
Just curious, why not include xgsch2pcb functionality inside of gschem?
As an aside, the first thing that lept to mind, was the Unix philosophy
of "one tool, one job." So, I started digging to find where it came
from. It's one of those "quoted all over the place, but no origin to be
found" kind of phrases.
The best I could find was this [1], which sums it up nicely.
I personally don't use xgsch2pcb. I run gsch2pcb from a Makefile, but
that's my personal preference. I prefer to script jobs that shouldn't
need to be interactive. ymmv.
thx,
Jason.
[1] - http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch01s06.html
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
