> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David SMITH > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:32 AM > To: gEDA user mailing list > Subject: Re: gEDA-user: OT: Bike Alarms > > On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 20:09 -0500, John Griessen wrote: > > Lojack gets results for cars. There's bound to be some way to do > > something that fits in with what happens with bikes. Why > give up so easy? > > It's easier to fit to cars because there are more places to > hide a box like this, and the car has a permanent power > supply available so the user doesn't have to take the unit > out for recharging.
... > > A thief would not get results taking headsets off bikes he > wanted to take... > > so it's not a dead end. > > Also a bit of a PITA for the user having to take off the > headset frequently for recharging. That's why I suggested the seat tube; the adjustments aren't as finicky as the head tube is. D _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
