On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:42:21PM -0600, John Doty wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 1:01 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > I figure we need each layer to specify: > > > > * type (copper, silk, mask, anti-copper, keepout, etc) > > There are no types, there are only properties. >
I disagree. Replace the word "copper" with "conductor" and you will see what I mean. If you have two different conductive materials, with different properties, then yes, the layer needs to have property information. Even so, I don't think it's as as high a priority as layer unification. > The conductors may not be copper. I've even worked with a board that > had two different conductive materials on the same physical layer. > Then perhaps the material used should be a property of the traces, not a property of the layer. Andrew _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
