On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:07:16 +0100 Stephan Boettcher <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is fundamentally different from how PCB treats copper, > connectivity and netlist now, and restricts the flexifility of the > tool that results from how it works now. So, that would be a > separate set of changes. > > The current netname only as documentation? The thing made post my previous message, is that it is very annoying when unconnected line stays on PCB, and there is no chance to connect anything to it. Even to the net it was formerly connected. Other solution to this would be to let anything to be connected to copper objects (Via, line) when it is not connected to anything. > Anyway, a flexible format (like xml) can accomodate everything, > syntactically. I was thinking mostly about semantics, now. Ok, I like your ideas. Levente _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
